Cost savings
Approximately 43% of organisations have identified savings or anticipate cost savings associated with emission reduction initiatives. For example, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Te Tāhū o te Ture, is seeing notable achievements in the energy and cost saving space. Between FY24 and FY25, MoJ saw reductions of $371,000 in electricity costs and $263,000 in gas costs.
Some organisations are exploring ways to significantly reduce their energy consumption while also generating their own energy. This includes a combination of energy-efficiency initiatives and the installation of solar PV systems, which directly offset energy use and emissions across their operations.
The Department of Internal Affairs, Te Tari Taiwhena, has completed its highly successful sustainability project at the National Library. As a result of the project, the current energy savings are almost entirely offsetting the additional energy demand from the new archives building, Te Rua, which came online July 2025. Energy savings came from the following initiatives: sealing of air leaks, demand-controlled ventilation and installing energy monitoring infrastructure. Additionally, the investment in solar energy will provide long-term reductions in carbon emissions and operating costs. The Department is looking to expand this pilot to the rest of its Collection sites, pending the outcomes of feasibility reviews.
Another example of energy production is the solar installation at Lincoln University, Te Whare Wānaka o Aoraki, as part of “the Energy farm” initiative. It comprises of 3,000 photovoltaic panels and will have a peak production capability of 1.5MW or an average annual generating capacity of ~2.8 million kWh. This will offset an estimated 331 tCO2-e per year, demonstrating how capital investments in on‑site generation can deliver sustained emissions reductions and operating cost savings for institutions with large energy loads.
Data Improvements
The first of the 1.5-degree aligned target years offers a reflection on the progress organisations have individually made and that the programme has made. The CNGP began with organisations primarily reporting on mandatory emissions: scopes 1, 2 and mandatory 3. Over the past few years of reporting, organisations’ data quality, confidence and reporting have matured. This is reflected in greater accuracy and expansion of reporting and of significant value‑chain (non-mandatory scope 3) emissions categories becoming an increasing focus.
For example, commuting emissions are now being more widely measured as organisational data maturity improves. In 2025, 42 organisations reported commuting emissions, up from 22 in 2023. For some organisations, commuting has emerged as their largest or second largest source of emissions source, with total reported commuting emissions of 118,337 tCO2-e in 2025.
Other organisations have improved and implemented new record keeping software enabling more automated and accurate data gathering and forecasting. For example, ACC has migrated sustainability data to Oracle Sustainability EPM to improve data quality, reporting, and forecasting. This enables more informed decisions and supports the effective rollout of new emissions reduction policies and initiatives. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade procured emissions-specific software that now holds both the Ministry’s emissions data and facilitates analyses. They have 59 sites and approximately 340 properties in 53 countries; they anticipate the software will allow easier identification of opportunities to reduce emissions and costs.