This final section provides guidance on how you might gain the maximum benefit from involvement in the resource consent process through building positive relationships with other parties involved in the consent process, particularly applicants and councils. The advice in this section plots a middle ground that responds to concerns expressed by tangata whenua, applicants and councils. Responding to these concerns - while maybe not what you always want to do - is in the long term interests of tangata whenua.

This section acknowledges that consultation with, and involvement of, tangata whenua is a right not a privilege. But it also acknowledges that:

  • there is a strong element of reciprocity in consultation - there are, in other words, obligations associated with the right to be consulted
  • tangata whenua can be most effective in protecting their interests in resource management by conducting their involvement in a business-like and professional way.

This section looks at:

  • mutual expectations
  • what tangata whenua can expect of councils and applicants
  • what councils and applicants expect of tangata whenua.

General expectations of all parties

There are three general expectations that all parties should hold about the RMA consent process and associated consultation. These are that all parties:

  • enter into consultation processes in good faith
  • acknowledge that resource consents often involve potential economic and social benefits for the community as well as environmental and cultural costs, and that these need to be weighed in the responses provided
  • participate positively by, where possible, looking for solutions to issues that might work for all parties.

What tangata whenua can reasonably expect from councils and applicants

Facilitation of consultation

You can expect that councils will not trouble you with trivial issues. This of course depends very much on the level of information a council has on your concerns.

There can be a danger when councils decide on what is of importance to you if you are not involved in defining those issues. What may seem trivial to a council may not be trivial in cultural terms. One example may be losing some flax as part of a swamp drainage, where there is seen to be plenty of flax in an area. The council may not be aware that that flax is the only good weaving flax that maintains a tradition of korowai making.

However, you can reasonably expect:

  • to be consulted about issues that might concern you
  • that councils will routinely advise applicants that you have an interest in particular applications, and supply applicants with:
    • the name of the appropriate tangata whenua contact
    • the contact details of that person
    • advice about the preferred consultation method of your particular tangata whenua organisation or group (if known)
    • any particular protocols that may apply.

Manner of consultation by the applicant

You can reasonably expect that applicants will consult in a genuine manner. Those consulting should:

  • understand that true consultation involves the presentation of a proposal, not the final version
  • undertake consultation early, allowing enough time for you to respond
  • be prepared to listen and consider responses
  • provide enough information to enable you to respond meaningfully - including offering a site visit
  • acknowledge that merely providing people with an opportunity to make a submission will not, in itself, generally be regarded as acceptable consultation.

If consultation by an applicant hasn't been adequate, then you can reasonably expect that councils will take this into account in considering the application.

Recognition of the costs of consultation incurred by tangata whenua

Tangata whenua can reasonably expect that both councils and applicants will understand and acknowledge the realities facing them, including that they:

  • incur costs in responding to resource consents
  • are generally not well resourced
  • often have internal decision-making processes (and in particular a preference for consensus), which means they need a reasonable time period within which to respond.

Many organisations and groups that represent tangata whenua expect applicants to recompense them for the actual and reasonable costs incurred in responding to requests for consultation. They also expect that as part of their project planning, applicants will make allowances for the time it takes tangata whenua to provide a response on a particular application.

Support for participation

Councils are increasingly providing resources to tangata whenua to enable them to participate in consultation effectively. This might involve one or more of a variety of measures, including:

  • providing funding assistance
  • assisting in capacity building (see adjacent text box)
  • appointing liaison officers to facilitate good information exchange and consultation between tangata whenua, applicants and councils
  • providing access to information held by councils that might assist tangata whenua make useful responses to applicants
  • making commitments to attend regular hui, and review processes and practices.

The nature of the support will depend on the commitment and resources of the council, the needs of tangata whenua, and the ongoing number of applications of interest to tangata whenua.

If the council does not provide the advice suggested above, you should raise these matters in your discussions over any relationship agreement you might have, or that you may be seeking to reach.

Capacity building

Capacity building initiatives might include:

  • appointing a consent officer to help tangata whenua understand the consent process and the technical implications of the consent application
  • organising workshops for tangata whenua representations on RMA processes and issues
  • providing funding assistance for tangata whenua representatives to attend expert seminars and training schemes
  • summarising applications and related information to assist tangata whenua to understand issues quickly
  • assisting in the development of iwi management plans.

What councils and applicants expect from tangata whenua

In terms of developing and maintaining good relationships in resource consent processes, you should be aware of the following expectations.

Timeliness

Councils and applicants expect that, in responding to requests for comment or information, tangata whenua will:

  • recognise the commercial pressures faced by applicants and the statutory timeframes and political pressure often imposed on councils, and respond within a reasonable timeframe, with no undue delay
  • keep to timeframes that have been agreed to by their representative organisations or groups
  • inform the parties in advance if they can't keep to a timeframe (because of unforeseen circumstances) and offer a new timeframe
  • inform the council of changes in contact details as soon as possible.

Often an extended period of silence after a request for consultation will be interpreted by councils, and particularly applicants - however erroneously - as a sign that tangata whenua have no view, or no concerns, about an application.

Statutory timeframes under the RMA

The RMA imposes timeframes on the councils' processing of resource consents. In general terms, the RMA gives councils 20 working days to process an application that is not publicly notified.

Applications that are publicly notified have timeframes for every step of the process.

In addition, everyone involved in the consent process is under a general statutory obligation to avoid undue delay.

Responsiveness

Councils and applicants expect that, in responding to requests for comment or information, tangata whenua will:

  • keep to agreements reached with applicants or councils to the best of their ability
  • act on agreements reached - make sure they do what they say they will do
  • provide responses in writing (or email or fax)
  • let applicants and councils know promptly if they don't have an interest in an application referred to them.

Certainty

Councils and applicants expect that, in considering what response to make, tangata whenua will:

  • draw on any existing iwi management plans (and constantly review and update iwi management plans on the basis of experience)
  • respond in ways that can be given effect to and, wherever possible, be specific about what value exists and where it exists
  • be consistent in the way they approach applications and applicants.

Charging

If establishing a charging regime, councils and applicants expect that tangata whenua will:

  • understand and acknowledge that as tangata whenua you are in a monopoly position, so that in most cases the applicant cannot go elsewhere for information
  • adopt appropriate charging practices, in particular:
  • provide estimates of likely cost when asked
  • make the fees (including charge-out rates) transparent by indicating charges for specific tasks before work commences
  • set any hourly rates according to the skills that are being applied (eg, office administration costs would not be charged at the same rate as expert input)
  • operate a business-like charging system, including:
    • sending out invoices (with a GST number if applicable)
    • itemising invoices (so that fees and disbursements are separated and disbursements are itemised)
    • giving a summary on the invoice of the services provided
    • keeping sufficient records so that an explanation of invoices can be provided if the invoice is challenged.

If you follow standard business practices, you will develop a degree of confidence between the applicant and yourself and, in the long run, the council. Your success in protecting your taonga lies in good relationships as much as in the power of legislation.

Can I charge for my input into a resource consent application?

There is nothing in the RMA that stops tangata whenua (or anybody else) charging for providing input. However, there is also nothing in the RMA that requires anyone to pay.

In general, applicants' willingness to pay will depend on the quality of the service they get and the reasonableness of the charges compared to other types of expert advice they might commission.

 

See more on...