Since the passing of the Resource Management Act (RMA) in 1991, iwi have been encouraged to become more involved in resource management processes. A key tool for being more involved has been the development of a planning document that presents the views of iwi – commonly referred to as an Iwi Management Plan (IMP).

The stocktake of IMPs was to identify the iwi, hapū or whanau that produced them, the date the IMP was produced, and the region of the country where the group in located. KCSM understand this is the first stocktake of IMPs to determine the extent to which this strategy for RMA involvement for has been pursued by iwi.

Methodology

To take stock of the existing IMPs, KCSM developed the following:

  • a comprehensive list of iwi, hapū and related organisations using lists from the Ministry for the Environment, regional councils, Tūhono and Te Ohu Kaimoana

  • a telephone questionnaire.

The final list was as comprehensive as possible, and included all organisations representing iwi, hapū and other organisations representing more than one iwi.

The telephone questionnaire is in Appendix 1. This questionnaire was used to check a wide range of information from respondents in five to 10 minutes. More detailed information was provided subsequently by the sample of 10 iwi organisations selected for face-to-face interviews.

Findings

The following tables summarise the information assembled by telephoning the iwi organisations on the list generated as above.

Table 1. List of iwi / hapū and iwi / hapū organisations by region

Region Iwi / Hapū Iwi / Hapū Organisations

Te Taitokerau

10

10

Hauraki

6

4

Tamaki Makaurau

6

6

Waikato

5

5

Te Arawa

7

7

Mataatua

10

10

Te Tairawhiti

5

4

Takitimu

6

6

Taranaki

7

7

Whanganui

2

2

Te Upoko o Te Ika

6

6

Te Tau Ihu

7

7

Te Wai Pounamu

4

3

TOTAL

81

77

Table 2. Responses to telephone survey

 

Number

Proportion (%)

Iwi organisations

77

100%

Listed as having an IMP

38

49%

Responded to the telephone contact

40

53%

Agreed to do the phone survey when contacted

31

78%

Those surveyed that stated they had an IMP

16

52%

Not contactable by phone after three attempts

37

48%

Not contactable and listed as having an IMP

22

59%

Of the 40 organisations spoken to, six could not respond as they had to clear the information to be provided with their trustees, and the next trustee meeting was beyond the limited time available for the review.

Table 3 below lists those 16 iwi organisations that responded to the telephone survey and had IMPs. The table identifies the date their IMP was completed and the region they are in.

Table 3. Iwi organisations with IMPs based on the phone survey

Iwi Organisation IMP Date Region

Ngati Wai Trust Board

In progress

Te Taitokerau

Te Runanga o Te Rarawa

1998

Te Taitokerau

Te Runanga O Ngati Rehia

2004

Te Taitokerau

Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua

1992

Te Taitokerau

Hauraki Māori Trust Board

2004

Hauraki

Te Kawerau a Maki

1995

Tamaki Makau Rau

Maniapoto Māori Trust Board

2002

Waikato

Waikato Raupatu Lands Trust

1998

Waikato

Ngai Te Rangi Charitable Trust

1995, 1999

Mataatua

Te Runanga o Ngati Pikiao

1987

Te Arawa

Whakatohea Māori Trust Board

1993

Mataatua

Te Iwi o Rakaipaaka

2000

Takitimu

Ngati Rarua ki Wairau Trust

2002

Te Tau Ihu o Te Ika

Ngati Koata Trust

2002

Te Tau Ihu o Te Ika

Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu

1997

Te Waipounamu

Kai Tahu Ki Otakau

1995

Te Waipounamu

Table 4 below lists another 19 iwi groups by region and identified as having Iwi Management Plans according to information provided by councils.

Table 4. Iwi organisations not contacted but listed by councils as having IMPs

Iwi Organisation Region

Ngāti Whatua o Orakei Māori Trust Board

Te Tai Tokerau

Te Hao o Ngāti Whatua

Te Tai Tokerau

Awaroa Ki Manuka

Tamaki Makaurau

Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Trust.

Tamaki Makaurau

Ngāti Paoa Whanau Trust Board

Tamaki Makaurau

Ngāti Rehua-Ngatiwai ki Aotea Trust

Tamaki Makaurau

Ngā Tai Ki Umupuia

Tamaki Makaurau

Te Runanganui O Tapuika me Waitaha

Mataatua

Ngati Pukenga ki Tauranga

Mataatua

Runanga o Ngaiterangi

Mataatua

Tuwharetoa ki Kawerau

Mataatua

Ngai Tai

Mataatua

Ngati Porou Hapū

Tairawhiti

Te Iwi O Rongomaiwahine

Tairawhiti

He Tohu Pou Whenua Taranaki

Taranaki

Te Runanga o Ngati Hauiti

Te Upoko o Te Ika

Ngati Raukawa

Te Upoko o Te Ika

Te Atiawa Manawhenua Ki Te Tau Ihu

Te Tai Ihu o Te Ika

Ngati Toa Ki Wairau

Te Tai Ihu o Te Ika

Of the iwi organisations that agreed to do the phone survey but did not have an IMP at present (15), all intended to develop one in the future. Reasons for not having already developed a plan included:

  • lack of resources – including funds, time and people to develop a plan

  • lack of capacity – specifically intellectual capacity to develop and implement the plan

  • lack of support – from district and regional councils

  • not a priority at the moment.

Conclusions

A total of 77 organisations were identified as relevant to this investigation. Thirty-eight organisations were listed by councils as having an IMP.

Of the iwi organisations that agreed to do the phone survey (31), 16 had IMPs, and the rest (15) were keen to develop one.

 

See more on...