3.1 Introduction

Sampling was carried out at Site A on 19 September 2002. Samples were collected from the arc furnace discharge to determine the concentration of PCDD and PCDF present in the gases discharged to the atmosphere.

There were two sample ports on the duct exiting the arc furnace. The sample ports were approximately five diameters down stream from any disturbance to the flow and approximately one diameter upstream from the exit to the flow. As such the ports were not ideal for sampling particulate matter.

Each duplicate was sampled from one port.

Details of the sampling times and stack dimensions are:

  • sampling times: Samples 1 and 2 (duplicate sampling): 11:58-15:10
  • stack dimensions: 0.57 x 0.53 metre rectangular duct.

3.2 Results

Table 3.1: Particulate emissions from arc furnace

Sample Sample mass
(g)
Particulate emissions
(mg/m3, dry, 0°C, 1 Atm) (kg/h)

1

0.0451

17.8

0.42

2

0.0281

7.3

0.20

Average

 

12.6

0.31

Table 3.2: Average stack gas conditions at the arc furnace sampling point 1 (small hot box)

CO2 Temperature
(°C)
Moisture
(%)
Velocity
(m/s)
Flow rate
(%, wet) (%, dry) (m3/s) (m3/s, 0°C, 1 Atm, dry)

<0.5

<0.5

25.8

1.3

24.1

7.3

6.6

 

Table 3.3: Average stack gas conditions at the arc furnace sampling point 2 (large hot box)

CO2 Temperature
(°C)
Moisture
(%)
Velocity
(m/s)
Flow rate
(%, wet) (%, dry) (m3/s) (m3/s, 0°C, 1 Atm, dry)

<0.5

<0.5

25.8

1.2

27.6

8.3

7.5

 

Table 3.4: Results of isokinicity for arc furnace

Sample Actual sample volume
(m3, 0°C, 1 Atm, dry)
Calculated sample volume
(m3, 0°C, 1 Atm, dry)
Isokinicity
(%)

1

2.5333

2.7918

91%

2

3.8386

4.1972

91%

All samples are within the required isokinicity range of 100 ± 10%.

Table 3.5: Average combustion gas results

CO
(mg/m3)
SO2
(mg/m3)
NO
(mg/m3)
O2
(%)
NO2
(mg/m3)

54.5

< 25

24.7

21.1

<9

The weight of scrap metal melted during the sampling was 3.45 tonnes. This number was used for both samples as sampling occurred at the same time.

Table 3.6: Summary results from arc furnace sample 1 trap, rinses and filter

    Concentration
(ng/m3)
Emission
(ng/hr)
Emission
(ng/tonne)

Sum of PCDD and PCDF congeners

Excluding LOD values

0.609

14,381

13,339

Including half LOD values

0.649

15,313

14,203

Including LOD values

0.688

16,245

15,068

Total I-TEQ

Excluding LOD values

0.0118

279

259

Including half LOD values

0.0136

322

298

Including LOD values

0.0154

365

338

Total WHO-TEQ

Excluding LOD values

0.0140

330

306

Including half LOD values

0.0158

372

345

Including LOD values

0.0175

414

384

 

Table 3.7: Results from arc furnace (individual congeners sample 1 trap, rinses and filter)

View results from arc furnace (individual congeners sample 1 trap, rinses and filter) (large table)

Table 3.8: Summary results from arc furnace sample 2 trap, rinses and filter

    Concentration
(ng/m3)
Emission
(ng/hr)
Emission
(ng/tonne)

Sum of PCDD and PCDF congeners

Excluding LOD values

1.06

28,515

26,448

Including half LOD values

1.06

28,515

26,448

Including LOD values

1.06

28,515

26,448

Total I-TEQ

Excluding LOD values

0.0218

590

547

Including half LOD values

0.0235

635

589

Including LOD values

0.0252

681

632

Total WHO-TEQ

Excluding LOD values

0.0240

648

601

Including half LOD values

0.0257

694

644

Including LOD values

0.0274

740

686

 

Table 3.9: Results from arc furnace (individual congeners sample 2 trap, rinses and filter)

View results from arc furnace (individual congeners sample 2 trap, rinses and filter) (large table)

See more on...